The Hot Zone Book Characters Unveiled

The Hot Zone book characters, a captivating cast of individuals, stand at the forefront of this narrative. Their journeys, motivations, and relationships intertwine to create a compelling story. From initial impressions to profound transformations, each character plays a vital role in shaping the plot and conveying its deeper themes. This exploration delves into the complexities of these individuals, illuminating their strengths, weaknesses, and the conflicts they face.

A journey into their souls, their actions, and their impacts on the overall narrative.

This exploration examines the evolution of each character, tracing their transformations throughout the story. It analyzes their motivations, relationships, and the conflicts they encounter, shedding light on their strengths, weaknesses, and symbolic representations. A deeper understanding of the characters, their individual journeys, and the collective impact on the narrative is presented, creating a comprehensive overview.

Table of Contents

Character Introductions

A cast of compelling individuals, each with their own unique struggles and triumphs, forms the heart of this gripping narrative. Their interactions, motivations, and eventual fates intertwine in a tapestry of suspense, driving the story forward. Understanding these characters and their roles is crucial to grasping the complexities of the story.

Main Characters and Initial Impressions

This section delves into the key players in the story, offering a snapshot of their personalities and initial appearances to the reader. Each character’s background and the initial reactions they inspire shape the narrative’s trajectory.

Name	Brief Description	Initial Impression
Dr. Nancy Jaax	A highly skilled, dedicated, and passionate epidemiologist with a sharp intellect and unwavering resolve.	Intense, focused, and deeply concerned, embodying a scientific approach to the unfolding crisis.
Dr. Robert G. Garry	A seasoned and compassionate veterinarian with expertise in exotic animal care, and an acute sense of responsibility.	Practical, resourceful, and unwavering in his commitment to the safety of the animals under his care.
Dr. Charles Monet	A meticulous and astute virologist with a keen eye for detail, a calm demeanor, and an understanding of complex biological systems.	Competent, analytical, and insightful, bringing a valuable perspective to the scientific team.
Dr. Carlton C. (Carlton) C. Gibbs	A meticulous and thorough laboratory scientist who displays an exceptional understanding of the intricate details of the Ebola virus.	Capable, systematic, and crucial to the team’s efforts in understanding the virus’s behavior.
Dr. (or Mr.) Richard W. (or Rick) Garrett	A skilled and astute field epidemiologist who is dedicated to preventing the spread of disease and is driven by a sense of duty.	Resourceful, observant, and deeply invested in the mission to contain the outbreak.

Significance of Each Character’s Role

Each character’s role is vital to the overall narrative. Their individual contributions, both large and small, shape the unfolding events and contribute to the book’s overarching themes.

Dr. Jaax’s dedication and scientific expertise propel the investigation and serve as a driving force in understanding the virus’s behavior and finding a cure.
Dr. Garry’s veterinary skills provide critical insight into the animal-to-human transmission, emphasizing the interconnectedness of ecosystems.
Dr. Monet’s virological knowledge allows the team to analyze the virus’s structure and properties, guiding their approach to the crisis.
Dr. Gibbs’s meticulous laboratory work offers invaluable data, allowing the team to track the virus’s evolution and behavior.
Dr. Garrett’s field work underscores the importance of rapid response and containment measures in preventing further outbreaks.

Character Development

The heart of any compelling narrative beats with the evolution of its characters. Their journeys, struggles, and triumphs shape the story’s emotional core. In the crucible of the hot zone, the characters are forced to confront their deepest fears and uncover hidden strengths. This transformation is essential for understanding the story’s impact.The characters’ responses to the escalating crisis reveal their intrinsic motivations, vulnerabilities, and resilience.

Their individual arcs weave together, creating a tapestry of human experience against the backdrop of a deadly threat. This journey explores themes of courage, fear, compassion, and sacrifice, all through the lens of individual character development.

Major Changes and Motivations

Understanding the driving forces behind character actions is crucial for appreciating their transformations. Fear, duty, and compassion are often intertwined, propelling characters to act in ways that might surprise or challenge our expectations. Their initial motivations, often rooted in personal goals or external pressures, are tested and reshaped as they navigate the perilous circumstances. The characters’ personal beliefs, values, and relationships become battlegrounds, forged and refined in the crucible of the hot zone.

Challenges Faced by Characters

The challenges faced by the characters are multifaceted and interconnected. From the ethical dilemmas of containing a rapidly spreading virus to the psychological toll of witnessing suffering and loss, every character grapples with unique obstacles. The weight of their decisions, the burden of responsibility, and the constant threat of death become defining factors in their individual arcs. The characters’ interactions and responses to these obstacles showcase the human spirit’s resilience and adaptability in the face of adversity.

Character Arc Table

Character Name	Initial Traits	Final Traits
Dr. Aris Thorne	Dedicated, meticulous, analytical; initially skeptical of the danger; driven by scientific curiosity.	Resilient, compassionate, courageous; understands the human cost of scientific endeavors; driven by a sense of responsibility to humanity.
Dr. Emily Carter	Competent, empathetic, driven by a desire to save lives; initially overwhelmed by the scale of the crisis.	Resourceful, decisive, compassionate; understands the need for collaboration and strategic action; driven by a sense of duty to her community.
Dr. David Chen	Loyal, resourceful, pragmatic; initially focused on personal safety; driven by a desire to protect his family.	Courageous, selfless, adaptable; prioritizes the well-being of others; driven by a sense of duty and loyalty to his colleagues.
The unnamed nurse	Dedicated, compassionate, focused on patient care; initially overwhelmed by the sheer number of victims.	Resilient, resourceful, calm under pressure; understands the importance of teamwork and support; driven by a deep sense of compassion and duty to the sick.

Character Relationships

The heart of any compelling narrative lies in the intricate web of connections between its characters. These relationships, both supportive and challenging, shape the plot, drive the actions, and ultimately define the very essence of the story. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for grasping the depth and complexity of the narrative.The interactions between characters in the Hot Zone reveal a spectrum of emotions and motivations, from profound trust to bitter rivalry, and ultimately impact the unfolding events.

The relationships evolve organically, reflecting the pressures and uncertainties of the crisis.

Character Dynamics

The relationships between characters, while complex, are ultimately crucial to the narrative’s success. They shape the motivations and actions of the individuals involved, creating a dynamic tension and contributing to the overall plot. The interplay of these relationships fuels the narrative, propelling it forward and creating a sense of urgency and realism.

Dr. Richards and Dr. Carter: A collaborative relationship built on mutual respect and shared expertise. Their shared dedication to scientific discovery and public health fuels their partnership, leading to innovative solutions and crucial breakthroughs in the face of a rapidly evolving threat. Their bond is forged in shared experience, pushing them to their limits as they navigate the ethical dilemmas inherent in such a crisis.
Dr. Richards and the Military Personnel: A strained, yet necessary partnership. The military’s logistical capabilities and Dr. Richards’ scientific knowledge complement each other, forming a crucial bridge between the scientific and operational responses to the crisis. Their relationship, while initially fraught with misunderstandings, is ultimately crucial to coordinating the effective containment of the epidemic. The military’s practical approach and Dr.

Richards’ deep understanding of the virus are instrumental in shaping the narrative.
Dr. Carter and the Local Community: This relationship underscores the profound impact of a crisis on the lives of ordinary citizens. Dr. Carter’s efforts to educate and reassure the community highlight the delicate balance between protecting public health and maintaining societal well-being. The community’s response and their trust in Dr. Carter’s expertise is critical to the narrative’s success.

Impact on Plot

The complex web of relationships significantly influences the plot’s progression. Conflicts and collaborations arising from these relationships create compelling narrative tension and drive the characters’ actions. The relationships are not static; they change and evolve throughout the narrative, mirroring the dynamic nature of the crisis. The plot, driven by these relationships, escalates to a climax, and ultimately resolves through the interactions between the main characters.

Trust and Distrust: The initial mistrust between Dr. Richards and the military personnel eventually evolves into a partnership based on trust and shared goals. This exemplifies how relationships can change and evolve throughout a crisis.
Cooperation and Conflict: The cooperation between Dr. Richards and Dr. Carter is pivotal in managing the outbreak. However, conflicts arise as the crisis deepens, highlighting the complexities of human interaction in challenging situations.

Visual Representation of Relationships

A network diagram visualizing the relationships between the characters would effectively illustrate the dynamic nature of their interactions. The nodes would represent each character, and the edges connecting them would depict the strength and nature of their relationship. A thicker line, for example, could represent a stronger bond, while a dotted line could signify a more tenuous connection.

The diagram would visually showcase how these relationships evolve and change as the story progresses.

Character Motivations

The heart of any compelling narrative beats with the motivations of its characters. Understanding the driving forces behind their actions, the personal stakes they face, and the conflicts that shape their journeys unlocks a deeper appreciation for the story itself. It’s in these intricate motivations that the characters become more than mere figures; they become individuals with hopes, fears, and desires, and in their struggles, we find ourselves.The motivations behind the characters’ actions are complex, interwoven with personal stakes and external conflicts.

Their goals, both large and small, influence their choices and propel the narrative forward. Examining these motivations reveals the story’s underlying themes and the characters’ evolving relationships.

Personal Stakes and Goals

The characters’ individual motivations are deeply rooted in their personal stakes and goals. These stakes often involve survival, the pursuit of justice, or the preservation of something precious. These goals drive their actions and shape their interactions with others. A character’s desire for recognition, for instance, could manifest in a willingness to take risks, while a character driven by loyalty might choose a path of self-sacrifice.

Dr. Evelyn Reed, a brilliant epidemiologist, is driven by her commitment to public health. Her personal stake is the well-being of her community, and her goal is to contain the outbreak and prevent further loss of life. Her motivation is fueled by the responsibility she feels towards the vulnerable and her unwavering dedication to science.
The soldier, Sergeant Miller, has a strong sense of duty and loyalty to his unit. His personal stake is maintaining order and protecting his comrades, and his goal is to complete his mission, regardless of the danger. This motivation is deeply influenced by his military training and his experiences in previous conflicts.
The skeptical researcher, Dr. Chen, is motivated by a thirst for knowledge and a desire to understand the unknown. His personal stake is the integrity of his research, and his goal is to uncover the truth behind the outbreak. He faces the challenge of overcoming his skepticism and embracing the possibility of something unexpected.
The frightened townspeople are motivated by fear and uncertainty. Their personal stake is their safety and the well-being of their families, and their goal is to escape the threat. Their motivations are shaped by the escalating crisis and their loss of control over their lives.

Conflicts and Challenges

The characters’ motivations are further defined by the conflicts and challenges they face. These conflicts can be internal, such as grappling with personal doubts or moral dilemmas, or external, such as struggling against opposing forces or insurmountable obstacles. These conflicts create tension and suspense, pushing the characters to their limits and driving the narrative forward.

Dr. Reed faces the conflict between her scientific approach and the urgency of the situation, battling her doubts and her fears.
Sergeant Miller grapples with the ethical dilemmas of war, forced to make difficult choices between the safety of his team and the potential loss of innocent lives.
Dr. Chen is challenged by the skepticism of his colleagues and the limitations of his resources, needing to balance his research with the practicalities of the situation.
The townspeople confront the conflict between their desire to survive and their fear of the unknown, needing to make difficult choices in the face of imminent danger.

Motivations and Story Themes, The hot zone book characters

The characters’ motivations directly contribute to the story’s themes. The interplay of these motivations, personal stakes, and conflicts creates a rich tapestry that explores universal human experiences. The story examines themes of survival, courage, sacrifice, and the power of human connection in the face of adversity.

The characters’ struggle for survival highlights the importance of resilience and the strength of the human spirit in the face of overwhelming odds.
The characters’ courage and sacrifice illuminate the importance of empathy and compassion in times of crisis.
The characters’ commitment to public health underscores the importance of science and rational decision-making in addressing global challenges.
The characters’ connection to one another demonstrates the power of human bonds and the importance of community in times of crisis.

Character Strengths and Weaknesses: The Hot Zone Book Characters

Disney All Characters Wallpapers - Top Free Disney All Characters ...

Understanding the complexities of our characters is crucial to appreciating the depth and drama of their journeys. Their strengths and weaknesses, interwoven throughout the narrative, drive the plot and shape their interactions, creating a compelling tapestry of human experience. The interplay of these attributes ultimately defines their roles and their destinies within the hot zone.

Character Strengths and Their Application

The characters’ strengths are vital components of the story. They represent their resilience, competence, and positive qualities. These strengths, when effectively utilized, propel the narrative forward, contributing to their successes and the overall unfolding of events.

Dr. Anya Sharma, a brilliant epidemiologist, possesses exceptional analytical skills, which are critical in diagnosing the emerging viral outbreak. Her keen mind allows her to quickly identify patterns and potential threats, enabling her team to respond effectively to the crisis.
Sergeant Miller, a seasoned soldier, exemplifies unwavering courage and a steadfast commitment to duty. His tactical prowess and resourcefulness are essential in maintaining order and safety amidst chaos, ensuring the protection of civilians and the containment of the viral spread.
The resilient citizens of the affected town, despite facing immense fear and uncertainty, demonstrate remarkable fortitude and compassion. Their willingness to cooperate and support each other in the face of adversity underscores the strength of community bonds during a crisis.

Character Weaknesses and Their Impact

Weaknesses, while often overlooked, are equally crucial in portraying realistic characters. They represent vulnerabilities and imperfections, making their struggles and triumphs more relatable and impacting the overall narrative.

Dr. Sharma’s tendency to become overly focused on data analysis, while admirable, can occasionally hinder her ability to connect with and understand the human toll of the outbreak. Her meticulous nature sometimes leads to a disconnect with the emotional needs of those affected.
Sergeant Miller’s adherence to strict protocol, although essential in maintaining control, can occasionally lead to rigidity and inflexibility. This can create friction with other characters and hinder adaptability in rapidly evolving situations.
The citizens, despite their remarkable fortitude, sometimes succumb to fear and paranoia. This can lead to mistrust and conflict within the community, exacerbating the already tense situation.

Comparative Analysis of Strengths and Weaknesses

This table highlights the contrasting strengths and weaknesses of key characters.

Character	Strength	Weakness
Dr. Anya Sharma	Exceptional analytical skills; decisive in crisis situations; unwavering dedication to science	Overly focused on data; difficulty connecting with the human element; can be emotionally detached
Sergeant Miller	Unwavering courage; tactical expertise; unwavering commitment to duty	Rigidity in protocol; inflexible in adapting to changing circumstances; can appear insensitive to emotional needs
Citizen of the Affected Town	Resilience; compassion; willingness to cooperate	Susceptibility to fear and paranoia; potential for mistrust and conflict

Character Conflicts

The heart of any compelling narrative beats with the rhythm of conflict. Characters, propelled by their desires and burdened by their flaws, find themselves entangled in a web of internal and external struggles. These conflicts are the engine that drives the story forward, shaping character arcs and ultimately determining the fate of the narrative. This exploration delves into the intricacies of these conflicts, examining their impact on the characters’ journeys and the overall story development.Character conflicts are the lifeblood of any captivating narrative.

They serve as the catalysts for change, pushing characters beyond their comfort zones and forcing them to confront their deepest fears and aspirations. Understanding the nature of these conflicts, both internal and external, is crucial to comprehending the characters’ motivations and the overall trajectory of the story.

Internal Conflicts

Character development often hinges on the internal battles fought within the individuals. These conflicts, stemming from personal dilemmas and moral quandaries, shape the character’s growth and decisions. They reveal the complexities of human nature, highlighting the constant struggle between desires, fears, and obligations. These inner struggles often stem from a character’s unresolved past, unfulfilled ambitions, or conflicting ideologies.

Dr. Zara struggles with the moral implications of her work, torn between her desire to save lives and the ethical concerns surrounding the experimental procedures. This internal conflict manifests in her questioning of the boundaries of scientific advancement, leading to moments of doubt and self-recrimination.
Agent Ramirez grapples with the guilt of past failures, constantly questioning his effectiveness as a leader and his role in the mission. This inner turmoil manifests in moments of self-doubt and a reluctance to trust his own judgment.
Dr. Smith is tormented by the haunting memories of a tragic incident, impacting his decision-making and causing him to question his abilities. This internal conflict fuels his anxieties, leading to erratic behavior and an avoidance of confronting his past trauma.

External Conflicts

External conflicts often stem from the challenges and obstacles presented by the environment, other characters, or societal pressures. These conflicts test the character’s resilience and resolve, forcing them to adapt and overcome adversity. The interaction between internal and external conflicts often creates a powerful synergy, driving the narrative forward.

The team faces resistance from government officials who doubt the efficacy of their work, creating a conflict that tests their dedication to their mission. The clash of ideologies and power structures creates tension and obstacles that need to be overcome.
The characters grapple with the rapidly evolving situation, encountering unforeseen obstacles and dangers that threaten to derail their efforts. This external conflict forces them to improvise and adapt to the constantly changing environment, showcasing their resourcefulness and determination.
The characters are constantly challenged by the hostile and unpredictable nature of the environment, threatening their physical and psychological well-being. This external conflict necessitates adaptability, resourcefulness, and a deep understanding of the environment’s limitations and capabilities.

Resolution of Conflicts

The resolution, or lack thereof, of these conflicts plays a crucial role in shaping the story’s climax and conclusion. Sometimes, conflicts are resolved through compromise, adaptation, or even acceptance. Other times, conflicts remain unresolved, leaving a lasting impact on the characters and the narrative’s themes.

Character	Conflict Type	Resolution
Dr. Zara	Internal (moral dilemmas)	Acknowledges the ethical complexities of her work, though a definitive resolution isn’t reached, as the ethical concerns remain.
Agent Ramirez	Internal (guilt)	Finds a measure of redemption through his actions and commitment to the team.
Dr. Smith	Internal (trauma)	Seeks therapy and confronts his past trauma, leading to a gradual healing process.

Character Symbols

The characters in this narrative are not just individuals; they embody broader themes and concepts. Their actions, motivations, and even their physical traits often serve as potent symbols, enriching the narrative’s meaning and resonating with the reader on a deeper level. These symbolic representations aren’t arbitrary; they’re carefully crafted to illuminate complex ideas and offer profound insights into the human condition.

Symbolic Representations of Characters

These characters, each uniquely positioned in the narrative, are more than just individuals; they’re symbols of resilience, sacrifice, and the enduring human spirit. They are powerful representations of how we navigate the complexities of life. These symbols are interwoven throughout the narrative, shaping the story’s trajectory and offering a deeper layer of meaning.

Examples of Character Symbolism

Dr. Evelyn Reed: A beacon of scientific expertise and unwavering dedication, Dr. Reed symbolizes the power of scientific inquiry in the face of adversity. Her unwavering commitment to her work, even in the face of immense danger, represents the tireless pursuit of knowledge and truth. Her compassion for those affected by the outbreak, exemplified in her relentless efforts to contain the epidemic, also symbolizes the altruistic nature of humanity.
The Infected: The infected characters symbolize the fragility of life and the devastating power of unchecked forces. Their transformation represents the destructive potential within the natural world and within human society when unchecked. They represent the fear of the unknown and the rapid erosion of normalcy.
The Government Officials: These characters, often caught between the scientific reality and political pressures, symbolize the struggles of navigating difficult situations and the compromises that arise when facing crisis. Their decisions, while often necessary, highlight the ethical dilemmas that come with responding to a widespread pandemic. Their inaction and bureaucratic hurdles highlight the failings of institutions under extreme pressure.
The Supporting Characters: These individuals often represent the community’s response to the crisis. Their resilience and acts of courage and selflessness represent the strength of the human spirit in the face of overwhelming odds. They represent the importance of community support and the shared human experience in times of crisis.

How Symbolic Representations Enhance Narrative Meaning

The symbolic representations of the characters contribute significantly to the narrative’s overall meaning. By embodying larger themes, the characters become more than just individuals; they serve as powerful metaphors that deepen the reader’s understanding of the central conflicts and issues presented in the story. This deeper layer of meaning allows the narrative to resonate with the reader on a profound level, fostering reflection and contemplation.

They create a lasting impression and encourage viewers to consider the themes and concepts beyond the immediate events.

Character Representation of Society

The characters in a story aren’t just individuals; they’re living reflections of the society they inhabit. Their values, struggles, and triumphs offer a window into the cultural and historical context of the time. Understanding how characters embody societal values reveals deeper layers of meaning within the narrative. This examination helps us grasp not only the plot but also the underlying currents of the era.The characters in a hot zone story, particularly, become potent symbols of resilience, fear, and the often-fragile balance between humanity and nature.

Their actions, choices, and reactions highlight the prevailing anxieties and aspirations of the society they represent. This is not just a tale of survival; it’s a story about how people cope with extraordinary circumstances and what those circumstances reveal about their society.

Societal Values and Concerns Reflected

The characters’ behaviors and motivations provide a nuanced portrait of the societal values and concerns prevalent during the time period. Their beliefs and fears offer a glimpse into the mindset of the era. These values, fears, and motivations manifest in various aspects of their lives, from their interactions with one another to their responses to the crisis at hand.

This examination reveals the social and cultural forces at play.

Portrayal of Societal Attitudes and Beliefs

Character portrayal often reveals the attitudes and beliefs prevalent in a society. The characters’ perspectives, biases, and prejudices, whether explicit or implicit, mirror the social dynamics of their time. This is crucial in understanding the narrative, as the characters are not simply actors but representatives of their society. These elements contribute to a more profound understanding of the story.

Cultural and Historical Context

The cultural and historical context deeply shapes the characters and their actions. Historical events, cultural norms, and prevailing ideologies influence how characters interact, react, and make choices. This analysis illuminates the societal backdrop and reveals the profound influence of the era.

Character-Society Connections

Character	Societal Aspect	Connection
Dr. Ethan Reed	Scientific advancement and its limits	Reed’s dedication to research highlights the societal drive for scientific understanding, but also the inherent limitations and ethical dilemmas within the field.
Nurse Amelia Carter	Women’s roles and societal expectations	Amelia’s unwavering commitment to her patients, despite the constraints imposed by societal expectations on women, embodies a changing attitude toward gender roles.
Local villager, Maria	Community resilience and tradition	Maria’s steadfast faith in her community’s traditions and the strength of human connection showcases the importance of cultural heritage in times of crisis.
Government official, Mr. Jones	Bureaucracy and efficiency	Mr. Jones’s adherence to bureaucratic procedures, while seemingly hindering the response, also reflects the societal pressures to maintain order and control.

These examples illustrate how each character’s actions, motivations, and beliefs are inextricably linked to the societal context of the time. This is a crucial aspect of character analysis, revealing the depth and complexity of the narrative. By understanding the characters’ relationship with their society, we gain a more profound understanding of the story itself.

Character Voice and Tone

A crucial element in bringing characters to life is their voice and tone. These aspects, often subtle yet impactful, shape how readers perceive and interact with the characters. Understanding how each character speaks and how their emotions are conveyed is paramount to crafting a compelling and immersive narrative. The voice and tone are not merely stylistic choices; they are integral to the characters’ motivations, relationships, and the overall message of the story.

Character Voice and Tone: Shaping the Narrative

The unique voice and tone of each character contribute significantly to the story’s atmosphere and the reader’s engagement. They reveal the characters’ personalities, backgrounds, and internal conflicts, ultimately driving the plot forward. A character’s voice, whether it’s formal, informal, sarcastic, or melancholic, can instantly communicate their role in the story and their relationship with other characters.

Examples of Character Voice and Tone

Dr. Eleanor Vance, the central protagonist, often speaks with a blend of scientific precision and quiet determination. Her voice is authoritative and informed, yet tinged with a subtle weariness from dealing with the relentless pressures of her profession.

Dr. Vance’s voice is authoritative, yet tinged with a subtle weariness from dealing with the relentless pressures of her profession. Her words, though direct, carry a sense of compassion, highlighting her deep understanding of the human condition, especially when facing life-or-death situations. Her observations, though scientific, also reveal her empathetic nature. A characteristic example of her tone is in her approach to communicating with the team, emphasizing clear instructions and fostering a sense of unity.

The research assistant, Mark, frequently uses informal language, showcasing his youthful enthusiasm and naiveté, contrasting sharply with Dr. Vance’s more measured tone. His voice is characterized by an eagerness to learn and a desire to assist, but also by a sometimes overwhelming fear in the face of danger. His voice often reflects a combination of excitement and trepidation, a blend of eager anticipation and anxiety.

He might express this through colloquialisms or exclamations.

The seasoned field operative, Sergeant Miller, speaks with a pragmatic, no-nonsense tone, reflecting his years of experience in high-stakes situations. His voice is firm, decisive, and often laced with a hint of cynicism, grounded in a realistic view of the world and the challenges faced. His tone, while tough, reveals a surprising depth of compassion beneath the surface, particularly when dealing with the victims or the afflicted.

“We need to secure the perimeter immediately; this virus is spreading faster than we anticipated.”Dr. Vance.

“Whoa, this is intense! Is there anything we can do to help?” – Mark.

“Don’t get too close; we’ve seen what happens when we underestimate this.”Sergeant Miller.